Who Killed Benny Paret ? By Norman Cousins

Benny P bet s Real KillersNo one can deny that temper has become a pervasive part of the American vitality . Violence is everywhere . It is delivered right at home accurate cable tv . It is considered a spurt of entertainment and gaudiness of Americans consume their dose of craze done the news and by dint of their patronage of prizefighting brags such as fisticuffs and wrestling thus , violence is as much part of the social gentleness of rich and poor alike , through their promotion and predicament in deadly sporting activities some(prenominal) inside and exterior the ringIn the quiz Who Killed Benny Paret Norman Cousins delivers a stinging reassessment of rules of order s complicity with the violence and ending caused by the immense popularity of prizefighting as a sport . The author notes that the observati ons of renowned box performer microphone Jacobs closely the consumers of prizefighting are in fact authentic and solid . People do not line up at boxing and wrestling matches because these sports teach value about natural selection or stamina . People go to expect boxing and wrestling bouts because of a more guttural subscribe to to imbibe 2 human beings trading punches that could kill them both . The sad death of Benny Paret is provided one check of the culture of violence that pervades America and the rest of the worldA young backpacker , Benny Paret went into a coma and never woke out of it after(prenominal) receiving too many punches on his head which caused severe head teacher hemmorhage . The g all overnment and the boxing authorities , alarmed by the outcome , launched an investistigation to determine state for Paret s death . This probe involved a probe into the blameworthiness of the fight referree , Paret s manager , and Paret s physical school in mak e his early demise . However , as Cousins ar! gues , the investigation glossed over the real perpetrators of Paret s death : the brutality of the sport itself which exposes its players to the risks of being maimed or killed in the ringOne cannot help but emphatize with Cousins despairing tang regarding the futility of the investigations on Paret s death . The outcome of the investigation itself has already been precluded by the fact that Paret s death is only a sign of a complex , and pervasive social riddle wherein the existence of prizefighting as a form of sport itself is super questionable . In this sense , investigating and trying to bulk the blame on the arbitrator for his perceived negligence is not only raw , it also worsens the problem . As Cousins justifiedly points out , the referee himself is compelled to perform his duties and responsibilities based on gathering expectations . That is , the referee cannot irrupt into the heat of the boxing match because two men are hurting each other : that is what the force pays for to watch in the first placeClearly , a more precise probe into Paret s death should look at the normative values and social standards that continue the existence of boxing and other forms of prizefighting as a form of entertainment...If you want to get a liberal essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper